E-volution: Difference between revisions
From ChrisWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(new - (computer science:creation science::e-volution:evolution)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
# No scientific test can be designed to show the existence of this alleged "''Intelligent Engineer''". | # No scientific test can be designed to show the existence of this alleged "''Intelligent Engineer''". | ||
# Therefore, computers never were "''Intelligently Engineered''", proof by contradiction, Q.E.D. | # Therefore, computers never were "''Intelligently Engineered''", proof by contradiction, Q.E.D. | ||
[[Category:controversial article]] | |||
Revision as of 09:32, 29 March 2007
E-volution is the scientific explanation of how computers came to exist, and is the one true fact. Its archrival, "Computer Science", claims that computers were designed by an "Intelligent Engineer".
E-volution explains that computers gradually and slowly e-volved from simple, useless forms, to more advanced and powerful forms, as has been practically proven by years of scientific study, as the following proof plainly shows. The problem with "Computer Science" is that there is no evidence of any kind of higher being known as the "Intelligent Engineer" which is alleged to have created computers and specifically manipulated them so that they would advance in power to what we have today.
Proof of E-volution:
- Assume that computers were "Intelligently Engineered".
- Then there should be an "Intelligent Engineer" somewhere.
- I don't see any "Intelligent Engineer" anywhere, and neither has anyone else.
- No scientific test can be designed to show the existence of this alleged "Intelligent Engineer".
- Therefore, computers never were "Intelligently Engineered", proof by contradiction, Q.E.D.
